Are you happy with the way your Revolut card looks? 
Give us your say in what you would change or keep with regards to the design of the card. If you do not have anything to add, maybe add a function that you would like to have when it comes to the design of the card 
We look forward to seeing what you come up with 
I feel that we have answered this before, and there should be a bunch of feedback lying around the forum.
For me personally, I do not use my physical cards anymore due to Google Pay. Although I like the Premium card designs, and although Metal cards are awesome, physical cards are becoming increasingly irrelevant for my daily spending.
I need my physical card when traveling. In general, but especially when spending abroad, I would prefer a card with the following features.
Security
Aesthetics
Is this a (bad) joke? Two postings about card design and otherwise just silence!? Can you please address app design, support, plans, etc.
In a comment above, @HeinrichP-DK mentioned the concept of a vertical card, and I share his interest in this.
In the design below, there is a premium/metal card which only shows the cardholderâs name, and a standard card which shows all of the relevant information.
This seems to make sense, because for the times when physical cards have to be used at an ATM or a POS terminal, they are generally used in a vertical orientation (with the exception of when the magnetic strip is used instead of the chip).
Iâm interested to know what people out there think about this. Putting designs aside for a moment, which card orientation would you prefer?
0 voters
Hereâs a question: how logical ist this argument really? For branding, maybe. But during chip and PIN transactions, the written informations on the card are irrelevant. So whatâs the best orientation for the use case when you actually have to read the card number? When typing it in an online form maybe? I would assume usability tests wouldnât show any benefits for portrait and maybe a slight advantage for landscape, mainly because thatâs what most users are used to. So is it worth it to have like 90% of all text on the card in portrait mode when those 90% arenât related to chip and PIN transactions?
I am not arguing against portrait designs. I like them aesthetically. But I believe they are powerful because they are a relative novelty. And benefits for brand recognition might come from that fact, and not because theyâre naturally used in this orientation for chip and PIN transactions.
The argument about the orientation came up when contactless wasnât really a thing. The first portrait design in Europe I am aware of was Hellobank in Belgium, around 2013. Today, the majority of transactions are contactless in many European countries with high volumes of card transactions, and ironically, with mobile payment and contactless, the landscape orientation is the more obvious design when applying the same logic. Yes, youâre occasionally still using chip and PIN, but wouldnât it be more obvious, if the most prevalent use cases would define the design?
Having said all this, I find portrait designs more exciting. But again not because they make more sense, but because they feel still a little new and âspecialâ.
I certainly canât disagree with your comments, @Frank! No problem exists which a portrait/vertical card would solve, and on the other hand, adopting this orientation would not create any new problem.
The orientation of the card would therefore only be a matter of personal preference, rather than practicality or usability.
My only input is that my wallet has a vertical design and thus a vertical card design befits me better.
I need the brand logo to be in the upper part of the card to be able to distinguish Visa/Mastercard when inserted into my wallet, and I know that Apple Pay users need the brand logo to be in the upper part as well due to the way Apple Pay shows cards in the overview section.
And no, I donât think of security as a âfeatureâ. There should be no discrimination between standard and Premium users in how card details are shown. In the end, card fraud from card skimming is a Revolut issue, not the customerâs issue.
I like the standard card designs of Monese, Starling, Petal, and Lunar Bank in Denmark. A common trait of these â they are very colorful.
Yes. The question is, why should a brand design a card either way? The argument you seemed to have brought up was that they could maybe boost their brand recognition. When the card would be used in portrait orientation, it would look its best. The design would work best when looking at it every day when using it. But now that chip and PIN isnât the most common way of interacting with the card anymore, should a brand still design a product under this assumption?
I would say maybe, because portrait still seems to be exciting. On the other hand, landscape is how cards are presented on smartphones and watches and how most people carry them in wallets and use them for contactless. So from the perspective of brand strategy, maybe thatâs how the card should look its best?
Interestingly, one of the best card designs before fintechs were a thing - first direct - kind of works both ways. I guess thatâs something I would pursue. Another exciting example is from the Australian fintech Up Bank. Itâs a portrait card. And it really doubles down on how to use the card with the chip.
Hello,
In my opinion it will be better without the name of the owner on it.
Best regards
Iâm in for vertical design.
Also please please use the new logo on cards 
The original 
logo looks a bit like toy company haha.
Looking forward for new metal cards 
Just some suggestions:
I have seen a lot of great additions above!
What I personally would like to see is a full âcard builderâ for customers (maybe because of the implementation restrict some features for free users).
In the card builder, you should have the freedom to:
What also would be awesome is to team up with Apple and issue Debit Apple Cards with the benefits on purchases in the Apple Store but thatâs a discussion for another topic 
Apple debit card would be an excellent idea!!
I think the cards look fake, I only have the standard one and it looks boring, it would be good to have maybe the flag if your country on it or at least a decent choice of designs, I would love the metal one but 12.99 per month when I dont need the âadditional extraâ is too much. I live in Turkey 
every looks at me when I use it its like a card from a monoploy game 
When I saw the flag cards I thought it was a Brexit joke⊠never thought Revolut would agree to countries flags on anything⊠Revolut suppose to be global company and issue local cards ⊠doesnât match at all of what Revolut represent.
Why someone needs to have the flag of a country in a card?? SeriouslyâŠ
Personally I think cards are a waste of money for Revolut⊠I would prefer Revolut to put the money to invent something new that no-one else has rather to change colours and material on cardsâŠ
