So agreed with you @Kastello . We have to be very “distinct” here and yet very “inclusive”. Our designs are very popular and there is no need copy others. Infact, personally I dont prefer transparant, it doesnt look good
I have used this service “Mistertango” and they aren’t sure of what they are doing in the industry. Their product and marketing policies is not consistent and recently they have completely overhauled their pricing structure not once but twice. It’s no way near to us @RevolutStaff
Their only added value is that they are crypto friendly and one of the very few to support crypto companies (I mean SMEs without a huge legal dept)
They’re also running a linked exchange
There’s no comparison between and MT’s crypto friendliness lol. Revolut likes to pretend to be friendly so they can take 1% in fees to let you get crippled crypto exposure, that’s basically it.
5 EUR is for personal users only, crypto businesses must pay 100 eur a month and 1 eur per transaction. But well they’re the only ones who will even bank crypto businesses, and I can tell you it’s still profitable lol.
So that’s good enough. You basically agree now that both are completely different business models and MT is a small fish currently and therefore needs to copy others (also for theri card design). Not Revolut!
Yes their targets are completely different and MT is tiny compared to but that doesn’t make it any more or less OK to copy other banks’ card designs.
I think both standard and Metal cards from look superb already and don’t need more change but if they wanted to they could make unique transparent cards that would stand out (unlike MT’s card).